Head to head

SchedulesMCP vs SeaRates

SeaRates, part of DP World, runs a broad multimodal Ship Schedules API: 160+ carriers and millions of schedules across 180,000+ port pairs, backed by real DP World scale. Where the two differ is access and depth: the SeaRates schedules API is quote-only, with pricing gated behind an account manager, and it doesn't publish a measured on-time reliability score. SchedulesMCP publishes self-serve pricing, lets you search any lane free with no signup, scores carrier reliability from observed arrivals, and exposes everything over a first-party MCP for AI agents.

Search a lane free Add to Claude (MCP)

SchedulesMCP vs SeaRates, side by side

  SchedulesMCP SeaRates (DP World)
Public, self-serve pricing Yes: free tier and self-serve keys; plan priced to your volume, VAT invoice Not published: quote-only / account-manager gated
Free lane search, no signup Yes: search any lane free at /compare
Sailing schedule coverage 60+ carriers · 72,000+ forward sailings · 5,000+ lanes · 255 ports 160+ carriers · 15M+ schedules · 180,000+ port pairs (DP World multimodal scale)
Measured on-time reliability scoring Yes: scored per carrier and per lane
Reliability methodology (observed vs declared) Observed berthing vs first-declared schedule, to the minute: 4,200+ port calls across 134 lanes and 42 carriers
Vessel-first / slot-sharing aware Yes: one card per physical vessel, slot-sharing partners grouped Not published
First-party MCP / AI-agent native Yes: first-party MCP server, 12 tools
REST API, self-serve Yes: free public endpoints + keyed API API exists, but access is sales-gated (request a quote)
Same-data container tracking sibling Yes: TrackingMCP, same data spine Yes: SeaRates / DP World container tracking

"—" means the competitor doesn't publish or offer this, as far as we can tell from public sources; "Not published" means it may exist but isn't disclosed. We'd happily correct anything out of date.

Honest about SeaRates

Fair to SeaRates: DP World scale is real. 160+ carriers, multimodal coverage and container tracking across a global logistics operator is a genuinely broad platform, and for enterprises already inside the DP World ecosystem it can be the natural fit. Our differentiators aren't about who has more schedules. They're about how you buy and what you can measure. SchedulesMCP publishes its price, lets you try any lane for free with no sales call, scores carriers on reliability you can audit, and speaks MCP natively. If you need enterprise multimodal breadth, SeaRates is strong; if you want self-serve reliability data and an agent-native API, that's us.
Search a lane free Add to Claude (MCP)

SchedulesMCP vs SeaRates: FAQ

Does SeaRates score carrier on-time reliability?

The SeaRates Ship Schedules API focuses on published multimodal schedules at DP World scale; it doesn't publish a measured on-time reliability score. SchedulesMCP scores reliability per carrier and per lane from 4,200+ observed port calls, measured against the schedule each carrier first declared, to the minute of berthing.

Is the SeaRates schedules API self-serve, or do I have to talk to sales?

SeaRates' Ship Schedules API is quote-only. Pricing isn't published and access is gated through an account manager or IT quote. SchedulesMCP is self-serve from the first minute: free lane search with no signup and a free public API tier, then a plan priced to your lane and query volume, with a VAT invoice. Talk to sales and you get a figure the same day, not a procurement cycle.

What does SchedulesMCP add over SeaRates?

Published self-serve pricing, free no-signup lane search, measured on-time reliability, and a first-party MCP server for AI agents. SeaRates' strength is DP World's multimodal breadth: 160+ carriers and millions of schedules across 180,000+ port pairs.

Compare the other tools

vs Linescapevs BigSchedules All comparisons →